Plagiarism

Like most profs I have had to deal with plagiarism cases. Over the years I have become convinced that the problem is not the odd cheater, but students who have developed habits. My hypothesis is:

Prepatory colleges in Canada that prepare foreign students for acceptance to Canadian universities are a breeding ground for writing coping tactics. Students who go to these schools unprepared for high school writing in English, learn from their peers a collection of tactics that let them get by. Because of the family pressure to succeed and the short time they have to learn to write in English, they have to avail themselves of these tactics and don’t feel they have the luxury of really trying to write in their own voice. We make matters worse by, on the one hand threatening them with expulsion if caught, and on the other hand offering no real alternative tactics or writing courses with individual attention in the first year. Further I suspect that:

  • Students know that plagiarism is an integrity issue, but are more scared of failure. Even if students don’t understand all the nuances of plagiarism they know they can’t write the way they can in their native language.
  • Students fool themselves by thinking it doesn’t matter for the moment, or that this is what everyone does, or that they will learn it later.
  • We fool ourselves into thinking that it does matter in the work world the way it does to us when, in fact, in many situations a report cribbed off the web that answers questions is good enough. There is even software to support such cribbing, see Net Snippets.
  • Students in this situation don’t trust staff or their professors to help them as they are committed to coping tactics and don’t have the oral communication skills to get navigate help without admitting they are doing something they know is wrong.
  • Students are using a variety of tactics and find it easier to modulate tactics or acquire new ones than to start writing. These vary from collaborating to buying essays.
  • These tactics are successful at getting passing grades on writing assignments.
  • Native English writers are a very different problem and interventions aimed at them won’t work with ESL students. Most plagiarism modules are aimed at native writers.
  • ESL and native writers have realized that in the economics of education it costs under $100 to buy a cust written 5-page paper that will not get caught and will get a B for the assignment. This is less than the cost of textbooks for a course.

In short, with ESL students we are dealing with habits formed before they come to university and habits are not changed the way exceptional behaviour is. Habits are changed by understanding them, understanding the triggers, providing alternative tactics, and motivating students to try alternatives.

A good site on plagiarism is, Assessing Student Learning – five practical guides from the University of New South Wales. PLAGUE is a special interest group based at Monash University who are researching the issue. See their papers and links.

Web Mining for Research

Web Mining for Research is a white paper I’ve just written to get my ideas down about how we should be using the Web as evidence not just for social science research, but in the humanities. Digital humanities is more than studying old wine in new digital bottles – the challenge is to do humanities research using the digital as evidence. For me the challenge is how to rethink philosophy now that we can mine concepts in their sites, to paraphrase Ian Hacking.

If I were Prime Minister…

Picture of David SuzukiLast night I went to hear David Suzuki at his Hamilton stop to the If YOU were Prime Minister… tour. This is a 50 city tour to “turn concern into concrete action”. Here in Hamilton the event was held in Hamilton Place which was close to full. In the lobbies there were displays from local ecological and political action groups. There was thus both large scale mobilization (Suzuki asked us to “vote” for the environment by filling out a card/petition for Ottawa) and there was local mobilization. He asked us to take the Nature Challenge, “10 easy life tweaks”.

One of the interesting points Suzuki made was that widespread concern about the environment is not new, the problem is getting concrete action. In 1988 there was a similar groundswell of concern, but politicians despite lip-service, didn’t deliver change. “If YOU were Prime Minister…” is about mobilizing us to concrete action at the local, national, and international level. It is about keeping an accountable focus on the environment.

So, what would I do if I were Prime Minister? First, I would develop a program that encourages communities to implement traffic calming so that our communities are more livable and not transportation corridors. I love the idea of the woonerf – Dutch for “living street”. For an extreme take, see Why don’t we do it in the road? by Linda Baker. Second, I would develop a national road toll system so that commuters have to pay for using all highways. The funds raised would go directly to public transportation along the corridors where the tolls are raised. The more traffic, the more funds for public transportation. This might work as traffic calming on the large scale. The idea would be to retake our streets and fund alternatives to highway use, two initiatives that would affect the carbon dioxide emissions from transportation, a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions.

Facebook Ethics

Image of FaceBook Annotated from USCAs I’ve been getting invited to become the “friend” of students and colleagues on FaceBook (I now have 91 friends) I have been reflecting on the ethics of representation on Facebook. The Silhouette has a story about the Unlucky seven Community Advisors who were fired after pictures showed up on FaceBook with them drinking while on duty. Inside Higher Ed has a story, Dental Pain at Marquette about a student disciplined for blog entries that didn’t fit the code of ethics. This raises the question of whether universities are developing their student codes to provide guidance about how to behave on the web. The closest I can find (after a quick Google search) is a very reasonable guide from the University of South Carolina, titled, Let’s face it. The guide suggests that students:

  1. Keep information that can identify you secret
  2. Post pictures that “flatter” rather than embarassing pictures that you wouldn’t want parents to see
  3. Show respect in wall posts
  4. Join the right groups – think about how they reflect on you

The other side of the equation is what should parents and profs do when we come across inappropriate material on FaceBook. I feel a little like I am eavesdropping on private conversations and should back out. To paraphrase the Marquette Dental School’s ethicist quoted in the Inside Higher Ed article, “It’s FaceBook. It is what it is and we shouldn’t take it out of context.”