Let’s face it; research and teaching are in conflict in the university. Despite all the talk about connecting research and teaching there are few models for how to do it systematically. For most of us it is a matter of time. Time to teach is time away from research. It’s that simple.
So what are the models for connecting the two?
- Scholarship of teaching is the model where faculty do research about teaching. (See my entry on the Boyer Report). This model has the advantage that it can legitimize those interested in teaching and learning as researchers. If systematically deployed it also would mean that there are teaching scholars accessible to those who are interested, but not devoted. The down side is that it doesn’t make sense, except in small undergrad institutions, for all to be teacher scholars.
- Undergraduate Involvement in Research is a second model where undergraduates are involved in research. See Mitchell Malachowski’s opinion piece “Undergraduate Research as the Next Great Faculty Divide”, in Peer Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, Winter 2006. This is done informally by many of us where there are opportunities. McMaster has an Applied Humanities course which is an inverted form of an independent studies course. The researcher proposes the topic and tasks and then recruits students to join them. Unfortunately, as Malachowski points out, in many disciplines where solitary research dominates, there are few opportunities to involve students in anything more than glorified photocopying. (See quote in the Extended Entry.) To involve students systematically, by which I mean across the curriculum, we need to adapt our research. I can imagine a discovery-centred university that values the learning through research of both students and faculty (and staff) where the structures encourage learning and research to adapt to each other.
- Undergraduate Led Research is a related model where undergraduates are given credit or funding for imagining and conducting their own research. Senior undergraduates interested in continuing to graduate school are often ready to run with projects on their own and they can be given opportunities structured like a research culture with poster sessions, mini student conferences, and so on. This is not for all students, however.
- Researchers make better Teachers is the standard answer we give, but I don’t think it stands up. Top researchers rarely see undergraduates, they get endowed chairs with little teaching or release to run projects. If we believed this the last people we would give teaching relief to would be the top researchers. Instead teaching release is treated as an incentive, especially today when teaching means large classes that need to be entertained rather than the conversations where research experience could make a difference. No, if we want student-centred programs it is best to not hire too many superstars.
Are there other models then?
Continue reading Undergraduate Research
What if you only remembered what you had read? In Umberto Eco’s latest novel, The Mysterious Flame of Queen Loanna, the narrator Bodoni wakes from a stroke with no memories other than the cultural ones – what he, an antiquarian book collector, has read. The first two parts of this novel dramatize the personal (and its loss) in memory. What if memory were only a hypertext of associations like Bodoni’s memories? What makes a memory meaningful? What gives it the “mysterious flame” of immortality?