Category: Internet Culture and Technology

Eugene Roman, the Group President of Bell Canada Systems & Technology, came to talk to a Communication Studies class about The Digitization of Everything: The MODern Era. In his talk and conversations after he asked us to look up and think about Holons. He asked us to think in the inverse – ie. not to ask how to make a better Google, but what an anti-Google would be like. He also talked about viral thinking and how to “infect” others. When we got talking about wireless (and he sees it all going wireless) he made the interesting observation that a barcode is a form of wireless communication, even if the distance is not great. What will we be able to do with barcodes if taking a picture of a barcode with a wireless camera-phone can trigger things?

Open research is defined on the Wikipedia as research whose “sources and methodologies are open to scrutiny and the results are publicaly provided…” This blog is an attempt at that.

How does Open Research connect with Open Access and, for that matter, Open Learning initiatives?
Continue reading Open Research

A colleague sent me a link to a Recall David Emerson Petition which got me thinking about online petition software. Can one set one up easily? Do they work? What are the ethical issues? How do you know you really have signatures? Here are some preliminary answers:

What sites offer online petition systems? I looked at three that seemed reasonable, PetitionOnline.com, iPetitions, and PetitionThem.com.
Continue reading Online Petitions

Interesting uses of Google Maps are cropping up all over. Vanessa sent me a note about GarbageScout.com. For those in New York it shows the location and images of interesting garbage that you might want to recycle. Contributors can e-mail a photo to GarbageScout with information about the location of the goods.

A common thread of discussion here is where is Google going? They seem to be very good at what they do, but what is there larger plan, if any? Google going after Microsoft and Apple is an article by Mike Langberg of the Mercury News (Sunday, Jan. 15, 2006) that suggests that Google’s plan is to go after Microsoft and Apple. Very ambitious, and possibly doable.

Thanks to James Chartrand for this.

More on the Wikipedia fuss. watching wikipedia watch is a blog entry on how Daniel Brandt of Wikipedia Watch outted the author of the false Wikipedia entry on Seigenthaler.

In an earlier story if:book, a group blog, comments on a Nature article comparing Wikipedia to the Encyclopedia Brittanica – they found them equivalent in terms of accuracy, though Brittanica articles were generally better written.

What is it with Wikipedia? by Bill Thompson of the BBC summarizes the recent fuss about the accuracy of the Wikipedia. For example John Seigenthaler wrote an opinion in USA Today titled USATODAY.com – A false Wikipedia ‘biography’ about the prank biography in the Wikipedia which suggested he was tied to the Kennedy assassinations. In his opinion piece he wirtes about his attempts to track down the joker who defamed him.

Today Google News had as a top story a joke news story in The Register by critic Andrew Orlowski that Wikipedia founder ‘shot by friend of Siegenthaler’. Orlowski references the Wikipedia on the shooting, though I can’t find the reference now. Working my way back through the Wikipedia history for the Jimmy Wales entry shows that today (Dec. 18) there have been an unuasual number of edits on the page including spurious ones with graphic pictures. His entry has become a site for contest and Orlowski is mocking it/Jimmy for and with this. Orlowski compares the Wikipedia to a roleplaying game for wannabe encyclopedia writers, but there is another game afoot which is more serious, and that is the game of the hack.

Is this the end of the open Wikipedia? Will it be hacked into forcing people to register to edit? Is it the nature of open systems that if sucessful they get vandalized?

Mike Mallon sent me a link to Zipwise Geomap. They sell a geospatial Ip database so you can get long/lat based on IP addresses. They show how the Google Maps API can be used to map your site visitors and how to get your own Geotargeting, IP Geolocating.

This is madness. Ideas aren’t things. They’re much more valuable than that. Intellectual property – treating some ideas as if they were in some circumstances things that can be owned and traded – is itself no more than an idea that can be copied, modified and improved. It is this process of freely copying them and changing them that has given us the world of material abundance in which we live. If our ideas of intellectual property are wrong, we must change them, improve them and return them to their original purpose. When intellectual property rules diminish the supply of new ideas, they steal from all of us.

Thanks to Slash.dot I came across this Guardian article on intellectual property, Owning ideas (Andrew Brown, Nov. 19, 2005). The article provides different examples from software to genomics. One of the examples the article provides is Microsoft patenting XML related technology for packaging objects into XML, see Microsoft slammed over XML patent – ZDNet UK News.

Can we patent the idea of intellectual property? Or the process of frivolous patenting of business practices?
Continue reading The Maddness of Intellectual Property

M. E. Kabay has a paper in ACM Ubiquity about viruses, malaware and scumware, Some Notes on Malware. It is a long piece (about 21 printed pages) that introduces the subject of viruses, gives a history, and ends up with a discussion of “scumware.” What is scumware, you ask?

Scumware is any software that significantly changes the appearance and functions of Web pages without permission of Webmasters or copyright holders. For example, a number of products overlay banner advertisements with other ads, sometimes for competing products. Scumware may add unauthorized hyperlinks to a user’s view of a Web page – sometimes using links to possibly objectionable sites. Such programs can interfere with existing hyperlinks by adding other destinations to the intended target. In addition, some products install themselves without warning users of these functions; others bury the details of their Web-page modifications in the extensive legalise of end-user license agreements.

I guess the idea is that such software puts scum on the clear surface of your web pond.