{"id":310,"date":"2004-04-14T18:09:49","date_gmt":"2004-04-14T22:09:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.theoreti.ca\/?p=310"},"modified":"2004-04-14T18:09:49","modified_gmt":"2004-04-14T22:09:49","slug":"problems-with-open-source","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theoreti.ca\/?p=310","title":{"rendered":"Problems with Open Source"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a title=\"Fundamental issues with open source software development\" href=\"http:\/\/firstmonday.org\/issues\/issue9_4\/levesque\/index.html\">Fundamental issues with open source software development<\/a> is an essay in First Monday that lists 5 problems with many open source tools. The essay is by Michelle Levesque at U of T and is based on her experience with adapting an open source package. The problems are:<br \/>\n&#8211; Poor user interface design<br \/>\n&#8211; Poor documentation<br \/>\n&#8211; Feature-centric development<br \/>\n&#8211; Programed for the programmers<br \/>\n&#8211; Religious blindness<br \/>\nShe points out how many of these problems also apply to commercial developments &#8211; the question is whether any of these are linked to the nature of open source development. She doesn&#8217;t quite complete the job of working from characteristics of OS development to the problems demonstrating the inherent strengths and weaknesses in the approach. That is perhaps for a further study.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nMy question is how this analysis of the problems would apply to Open Research? Can we imagine analogous limitations to open research? Here goes:<br \/>\n&#8211; Poor dissemination design &#8211; OR projects won&#8217;t bother to carefully design the disseminated results both because the results flow out (rather than get published at junctures) and because there isn&#8217;t the incentive to use design to sell the publication.<br \/>\n&#8211; Poor contextualizaton &#8211; OR projects could overwhelm new readers who haven&#8217;t followed the project. OR projects wouldn&#8217;t bother to place and market results in the proper context.<br \/>\n&#8211; Overwhelming detail &#8211; OR projects would overwhelm readers with details of the project and not have the benefit of an editor who would force the researchers to balance the work.<br \/>\n&#8211; Researching for the self &#8211; OR projects would be by a team for the team and could slip into vanity research &#8211; &#8220;watch me do this, who cares about the results and their applicability&#8221;. OR projects could be more about the team than the problem. The medium of OR would be the message.<br \/>\n&#8211; OR could become blind to commercially published or supported research. After all we all need excuses not to read research &#8211; there is too much around. OR teams could be tempted to only interact with other OR teams.<br \/>\nNote that this adaptation is based on a guess of what OR would be like &#8211; I don&#8217;t know if we have any examples of completely open research that self-consciously thinks of itself as open. Lets try it while remembering to beware.<\/p>\n<p>(Thanks to Matt P. for the reference.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Fundamental issues with open source software development is an essay in First Monday that lists 5 problems with many open source tools. The essay is by Michelle Levesque at U of T and is based on her experience with adapting an open source package. The problems are: &#8211; Poor user interface design &#8211; Poor documentation &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/theoreti.ca\/?p=310\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Problems with Open Source<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-310","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-programming"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theoreti.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theoreti.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theoreti.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theoreti.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theoreti.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=310"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/theoreti.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theoreti.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theoreti.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theoreti.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}